| |
 |
| Dr
Zavos with Connie Chung during his appearance on the Connie
Chung Tonight show on CNN at the CNN Studios in New York,
August 12, 2002. |
CNN
CONNIE CHUNG TONIGHT
Couple
Wants to Have Baby Using Human Cloning
Aired
August 12, 2002 - 20:00 ET
| THIS
IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS
FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.
CONNIE CHUNG, HOST: Good evening. I'm Connie Chung.
Tonight, a staggering step in human history. Is the
world ready for the creation of a human clone?
ANNOUNCER: They tried for years to have a baby, but
couldn't. Desperate, they have chosen to have a child
by cloning.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I think that God really wants
us to do that.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
ANNOUNCER: For the first time, you'll meet the pioneering
couple and the controversial doctor who could make
their dream a reality.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: The public will realize that this
is not as monstrous as it really sounds.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
ANNOUNCER: Would you, could you ever conceive a being
cloned to have a baby? Tonight, a look at the ethical,
religious, scientific and legal implications of human
cloning.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I don't care what the rest of
the world thinks.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
ANNOUNCER: Missing in America. Are children across
the nation targets? As her daughter's alleged killer
awaits trial, the mother of Samantha Runnion leads
a new crusade to protect our children.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
ERIN RUNNION, SAMANTHA RUNNION'S MOTHER: This is my
opportunity to make something out of my baby's death.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
ANNOUNCER: This is CONNIE CHUNG TONIGHT. From the
CNN Broadcast Center in New York, Connie Chung.
CHUNG: Good evening.
Tonight, a story your grandchildren may read about
in the history books one day. In its own way, it's
a story as big as humans walking on the moon. And
like that story, it hinges upon one small step. In
this case, that step is a couple's decision to have
a baby. It's history because this couple plans to
do it through cloning. If the procedure is successful,
next year, we'll see the first birth of a human clone
in history.
Contributing correspondent Michael Guillen has the
exclusive story of the couple who just may give birth
to the first of a new kind of human being -- Michael.
MICHAEL GUILLEN, CONTRIBUTING CORRESPONDENT: Good
evening, Connie. You know, I first met Bill and Kathy
a year ago. I flew to a secret location and heard
their personal story. Tonight, for the first time
on television, you're going to hear it for yourselves.
For reasons they'll explain, we had to decide their
faces and their voices. But you'll have no trouble
understanding where they're coming from. Their story
might make you angry or it might make you sad. It
might change your mind about cloning, or confirm your
worst fears. Either way, you're going to see just
how powerful the human urge to reproduce really is.
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
(voice-over): For most people, having a baby is child's
play. It comes naturally.
BILL, PLANNING ON HAVING A CLONED CHILD: At times,
you feel like you're meaningless, like you've left
nothing on earth.
KATHY, PLANNING ON HAVING A CLONED CHILD: It's like
this empty feeling. It's a hollowness. We want our
family. We want to complete that circle.
GUILLEN: Bill and Kathy want a baby so badly, they're
going to have one cloned, using her DNA. It means
flying in the face of huge public, political, religious
and scientific opposition. But they don't care.
BILL: It's a concern, absolutely.
KATHY: And that's why we're in shadow, because we
don't want to hurt that little life that comes into
this world.
GUILLEN (on camera): Why is it so important then to
tell your story to the world, Bill?
BILL: Education, so people slowly, slowly, or faster
or faster, get to know what this is all about.
GUILLEN: And that's why you're willing to risk going
public with your story?
KATHY: Absolutely.
GUILLEN: But you haven't even told your mother?
KATHY: No. I will, when the time is right, once we
know that there is a baby coming. My mother will be
so excited, she'll be jumping through hoops.
BILL: I think my mom will say, leave it up to you,
Bill, you'll find a way.
GUILLEN: You think they would accept and be loving
of a child that was born this way?
KATHY: Why not?
BILL: I think so.
KATHY: A little, sweet, delicious baby, what could
you not love?
GUILLEN: Bill and Kathy's unusual story began when
they met in 1989. He was a 40-something divorcee.
She was a 30-something career woman looking for Mr.
Right. Back then, they had no idea that having a delicious
little baby would turn out to be so incredibly difficult.
Back then, everything seemed so perfect.
KATHY: When I met Bill, he put his arm around me in
six minutes and asked me what I was going to do for
the rest of my life.
GUILLEN: Within six minutes of meeting you, he put
his arm around you? Bill...
BILL: I think it was actually five and a half minutes.
But within six minutes, I knew that Kathy was the
woman I wanted.
GUILLEN (voice-over): In 1993, Bill and Kathy got
married and immediately set out to have a baby.
KATHY: We first tried doing it the natural way. And
when that wasn't happening, Bill suggested that we
go to the doctor.
GUILLEN: The doctor put Kathy on Clomid, a drug designed
to increase the odds of having a natural pregnancy.
But after seven months of trying, nothing. Partly
the problem was Kathy's eggs. They're too old and
brittle. And partly, it's Bill's sperm.
BILL: I've had problems. I had three (UNINTELLIGIBLE).
You know, it's when -- you have a vein going to that
area and raise the temperature too high, so the sperm
goes down.
GUILLEN: Bill and Kathy decided to try artificial
insemination. The man's sperm is collected and manually
injected into the women's uterus. The woman's body
is primed beforehand with a cocktail of potent fertility
drugs. The injections were scary and painful enough,
Kathy says, but even worse were the side effects.
KATHY: You go crazy. You just...
GUILLEN: What do you mean?
BILL: The drugs would make her crazy, paranoid, insecure.
You could say it's rainy outside, rainy outside, why
are you talking about rain, because you're so on edge.
GUILLEN: Worst of all, after 17 artificial inseminations,
still no baby.
(on camera): At any point during that, did you ever
ask yourself, why are we putting ourselves through
this?
KATHY: Absolutely, all the time.
BILL: Why? We want a child. We want a child so badly.
But is it worth all this anguish? Absolutely, Michael.
We said it over and over to ourselves many times.
This is the last time we're doing it, this is the
last time, this is it.
KATHY: After each one, I said, that's it, I'm done.
And then a month or so later, we both looked at each
other and said, want to do it again?
GUILLEN (voice-over): Next, Bill and Kathy tried in-vitro
fertilization, or IVF. A woman's eggs are harvested.
A man's sperm is collected. Then, the two are brought
together in a petri dish. The fertilized eggs are
then implanted into the woman, with hopes that at
least one will take. Bill and Kathy tried IVF seven
times.
KATHY: It's almost as if someone is playing a big
joke on us. When I had a great egg month, Bill had
a bad sperm month. When he had a great sperm month,
I had a bad egg month. I mean, we just couldn't seem
to make egg salad together at the same time.
GUILLEN (on camera): Tell me about the last time,
the last IVF procedure.
KATHY: That was the killer.
GUILLEN: Tell me.
That one, that one was a great egg month, a great
sperm month. Everything was moving along rather well.
GUILLEN (voice-over): It was December 1998. The doctors
harvested four eggs from Kathy, fertilized them with
Bill's sperm, then placed all four embryos back into
her uterus.
BILL: He did it so slowly and so carefully and so
delicately, I was sure that two were going to attach,
and to make it as children.
GUILLEN: For two whole weeks, Kathy stayed in bed.
KATHY: We figured if I stayed completely still, these
little babies have to hold. And we named them. We
figured if we named them, they were little people,
they were going to become little babies and they were
going to be born.
GUILLEN: On New Year's Eve, the phone rang with the
news.
KATHY: Bill answered the phone and got the news. And
it was very, very sad. Saying they were sorry, but
your pregnancy test came back negative.
BILL: And that was five years -- felt really devastated.
GUILLEN: For the next four years, Bill and Kathy gave
it a rest. They'd run out of options.
But then one day Bill read this book on cloning. Then
he happened to see a newspaper article about a cloning
doctor based in Lexington, Kentucky. His name was
Panos Zavos.
BILL: They tracked him down, and I called him and
I called him and I called him.
GUILLEN (on camera): He wasn't returning your calls?
BILL: Nope. He finally picked up the phone, and he
said, I see you've been calling a number of times
and you're quite persistent.
I said, correct.
PANOS ZAVOS, PHD, EMBRYOLOGIST: Persistence always
pays.
GUILLEN (voice-over): Dr. Zavos runs a conventional
fertility clinic in Lexington. He has a PhD in reproductive
medicine. He's a professor emeritus at the University
of Kentucky, a member of the American Society of Reproductive
Medicine and an outspoken defender of human cloning.
He's testified before Congress, before the National
Academy of Sciences, and made headlines worldwide
by claiming he and a secret team of doctors are only
months away from trying to clone a human baby.
ZAVOS: The public realize that this is not as monstrous
as it may sound. Once they see a baby dressed in pink
or blue, they will say, what a wonderful thing.
GUILLEN: Dr. Zavos says he's got a waiting list of
some 5,000 desperately infertile couples, but only
six will be cloned in the first round. That includes
Bill and Kathy.
At their advanced age, he says, time is of the essence.
ZAVOS: If they don't reproduce within the next five
years, the chance of having quality time with this
child will diminish significantly.
BILL: I think we're doing medical history. I think
we're on the cutting edge and on the beginning of
a brave new world.
GUILLEN: It all begins next month or so when Dr. Zavos
tells Bill and Kathy, pack your bags, you're flying
to a secret overseas lab where cloning is legal.
KATHY: I don't believe he's told anybody where it
is. And he wants to make sure that the privacy of
it is kept as such so that the paparazzi don't get
in the way of this scientific procedure.
BILL: The only thing he does say is that we're going
to be flying someplace warm.
GUILLEN: At the secret lab, a team of doctors will
take a plug of Kathy's tissue and harvest her DNA.
Also, they'll take the egg from a younger women and
then replace its DNA with Kathy's. They'll implant
that egg into a surrogate mother. If the pregnancy
holds, nine months later, out will come Kathy's nearly
identical body double.
(on camera): Why the decision to clone Kathy and not
you, Bill?
BILL: Kathy suffered far greater than I did. She went
through 24 months of drugs, of injectable drugs which
could possibly cause cancer, and also, I think I'd
rather have a girl than a boy. As simple as that.
And God willing, if this works, maybe two years from
now, we'll clone me.
KATHY: Why not? Instant family.
GUILLEN: Why not just adopt?
KATHY: Well, we have thought about that. You can adopt
a baby overseas, and then in a lot of countries, what
happens is by the time you get the baby, they've been
so messed up in the orphanage where they are that
you are taking on a health hazard.
GUILLEN: But isn't that an argument for all the more
wanting to adopt a child like that, to show them some
love and kindness?
KATHY: Yes, you're right. You're right about that.
BILL: But there is also nothing wrong with wanting
your own, and having that right.
GUILLEN (voice-over): But what about the medical risks
involved? Scientists are finding that animal clones
are often born with awful defects. Doctor Zavos claims
it's just the result of sloppy cloning.
ZAVOS: There are bad mechanics and good mechanics.
There are bad doctors and good doctors. There are
good electricians and bad electricians. We are going
to hire the good mechanics, the good doctors and the
good electricians to do this. Therefore, our team
believes in what we're doing, and I think we're going
to hit a home run. GUILLEN: His team, he says, plans
to use the latest prenatal technology to ensure a
healthy birth.
ZAVOS: We have ultrasonic equipment with computers
attached to them, that they measure different things
and different growth measurements from the head to
the toe, and everything in between.
BILL: We're not going to give birth to a monster or
an abnormal child. If there is serious abnormality,
absolutely we will -- and Dr. Zavos concurs that we
will abort.
GUILLEN (on camera): And when you said the word "abort,"
you know, lots of people are going think, oh my gosh,
you're piling one abomination on top of another.
KATHY: Well, at least they'll have stem cells to possibly
help improve someone's life who is having a problem.
GUILLEN: So you would harvest stem cells from the
aborted fetus for purposes of research? But you know
how controversial that is, too.
KATHY: Well, I'm a controversial person. I'm not politically
correct. I never have been. I never will be.
GUILLEN (voice-over): But there is yet another objection
to this procedure. Even when animal clones seem to
be born healthy, time delayed defects often rear their
heads. The famous cloned sheep Dolly, for example,
appears to be developing premature arthritis. Dr.
Zavos disputes the evidence, but he admits cloning
is risky.
ZAVOS: For me to say that there are no risks involved,
that would be a pure lie. And for me to say I'm not
willing to take the risks, that would be finding me
as a chicken. I'm neither one of the two. I'm a risk-taker,
but at the same time, I'm a very cautious individual.
GUILLEN (on camera): As older parents, how are you
going to cope with the child who may evidence some
of these delayed birth defects?
KATHY: We'll face it and we'll deal with it.
BILL: If anyone can face and deal with it, it's us.
GUILLEN (voice-over): Bill and Kathy are equally confident
they'll be able to deal with success.
(on camera): Suppose you succeed. Suppose you have
a child through this procedure. Will you raise it
in secret? Or will you go public?
KATHY: We'll tell the world that this child was conceived
through cloning when it's safe for the child, when
the political climate and the emotional climate will
be accepting.
GUILLEN: What will you the tell the child herself?
Would you tell her that she is a clone?
KATHY: Eventually, yes.
BILL: I think I would just tell the child that she
was born by an in vitro process, without getting into
specifics until the child is an adult.
GUILLEN: What if she just gets angry at you? Why did
you bring me into the world this way, I'm a freak?
I'm completely different than any other human being
who has ever lived on the face of the earth. Are you
prepared that this child could be angry at you for
bringing her into the world this way?
KATHY: She's going to be treated like a very special
person from day one. And she's going to be loved,
loved and loved, and she's not going to ever feel
like a freak.
BILL: Absolutely not.
GUILLEN; What do you tell the child's doctor? I mean,
you can't keep that secret from a doctor.
KATHY: I never thought of that. We'll figure that
out, one step at a time.
GUILLEN (voice-over): Another thing Bill an Kathy
haven't figured out yet is how to pay Dr. Zavos. It
can cost up to $80,000, depending on whether an egg
donor or surrogate mother are involved.
(on camera): You are working class folks, you're hard
working people. Where are you going to get that money?
KATHY: I don't know.
BILL: All our savings, credit cards, borrowing, begging
and stealing.
KATHY: We're not going to steal.
(LAUGHTER)
GUILLEN: Figuratively speaking, I understood. But
I mean, seriously, how far would you be willing to
go to get this done? Would you be willing, say, to
mortgage your home?
BILL: I would be. She wouldn't be.
KATHY: I don't want to end up without a roof over
our heads.
GUILLEN: I know there are going to be some people
who will listen and they'll say, we don't all get
what we want in life. And part of maturity is accepting
that. Do you feel in your heart of hearts that you're
being a little bit immature, maybe a little irresponsible?
KATHY: Absolutely not. GUILLEN: ... by not accepting
and just moving on?
KATHY: No, no, I don't think there is any immaturity
here. I mean, come on, this is the future, and you
know something? If God didn't want us to learn how
to do all these things, then God would not have enabled
the scientists to be able to move on and learn and
do.
GUILLEN (voice-over): In fact, Bill and Kathy believe
it's their divine destiny to have a cloned baby.
KATHY: I think that God really wants us to do this,
that it is the next step. I can't imagine any other
reason why we haven't had a child, other than this
is what we were meant to do.
BILL: We realize there are a lot of people against
it for whatever reason, and hopefully they'll be educated
and understand and be sympathetic, and change. I really
hope so. I really would like their approval, but we're
going to do it regardless.
GUILLEN (on camera): You're willing to risk public
opinion, scientific opinion, you're willing to risk
being recognized and the secret getting out, and maybe
turning your lives upside down, right? I mean, are
you prepared for that?
KATHY: Oh, my life is always upside down every day
anyway, so what's the difference.
GUILLEN (voice-over): And what if, after all this,
they still don't get a baby? Then will they finally
call it quits? Well...
KATHY: Yes. We will call it a day at that point. We'll
say, OK, we tried.
GUILLEN (on camera): It will be the end of the road
for Bill and Kathy?
BILL: Maybe we'll try it once or twice more, but we're
not going to try it forever.
(LAUGHTER)
(END VIDEOTAPE)
CHUNG: Not forever, huh?
GUILLEN: Never say die.
CHUNG: Michael, is what they're doing legal?
GUILLEN: You know, the short answer is yes. I mean,
cloning, human cloning is illegal in certain states,
but there is no federal law, believe it or not, against
cloning. A lot of people have the impression that
there is. Congress is contemplating making it illegal,
and Republicans and Democrats and President Bush are
all against it, but so far it's legal. In any case,
the whole issue is moot, because they're going to
be doing the cloning, as I indicated, in a secret
lab in a country where it is legal. And even though
there are a lot of countries that are opposed to human
cloning, believe it or not, there are still some who
are for it. So everything is above board legally.
CHUNG: All right. Michael, don't go away, because
we're going to bring you back in again.
We've heard what Dr. Zavos had to say in Michael's
report, but when we come back, you'll meet this man
who's bucking the system to make history and possibly
make a human baby in a way no one ever has before.
Stay with us.
ANNOUNCER: CONNIE CHUNG TONIGHT continues in a moment.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
CHUNG: Contributing correspondent Michael Guillen
just introduced us to Kathy and Bill, who want to
make history by having a baby through the process
of human cloning. You also saw the man who is pioneering
this effort, and has weathered a firestorm of criticism
for doing so.
He is Panos Zavos, scientific director and chief embryologist
of the Kentucky Center for Reproductive Medicine.
Thank you, sir, for being with us. We so appreciate
it.
PANOS ZAVOS, PHD, KENTUCKY CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE
MEDICINE: It's my pleasure.
CHUNG: And Michael, I'll get to you in a minute.
But first, Dr. Zavos, I'll try to explain in the simplest
way so I hope that the viewers can understand. A normal
in vitro fertilization, you take an egg from the woman,
the sperm from the man, put in it a dish and it unites
to create an embryo, which you then put in the woman.
ZAVOS: Yes, that's correct.
CHUNG: Now, this cloning process, you take an egg
from the woman and you change the DNA...
ZAVOS: You remove the DNA.
CHUNG: And put new DNA in.
ZAVOS: New DNA, which comes from the donor.
CHUNG: From the donor, and that's all do you. It becomes
an embryo, no sperm.
ZAVOS: No sperm involved.
CHUNG: No sperm involved.
Now most people would say, I think: That's not natural.
That's weird. And that's why I think critics say to
you, you're going to create a freak.
ZAVOS: Not true, of course. And, you know, they used
to say the same thing about in vitro when we decided
to do in vitro 25 years ago, that creating a baby
in a petri dish or in a test tube is unheard of.
And, of course, they were saying exactly the same
things, the same arguments to Bob Edwards, the gentleman
that developed this technology in 1978 when Louise
Brown was born, that he was going to create freaks.
CHUNG: Yes.
ZAVOS: He was going to create people that don't belong
in this world.
CHUNG: But how do you know that that egg with the
changed DNA is going to grow into a normal human being?
You don't know that.
ZAVOS: Well, the results of various experiments that
we have executed plus the good results -- and I must
indicate here, the good results from many other studies
that have been done with success rates up to 100 percent
of normal offsprings born in animal models, OK.
CHUNG: Animals. Only animals, not human beings.
ZAVOS: Only animals. That's correct -- indicate that
this particular procedure can work in the human with
less difficulties than we see in animals.
The reason for that, obviously, is that we in the
human arena will be doing human IVF, that's manipulating
the sperm and the eggs and the dishes and the petri
dishes and the test tubes for almost 25 years.
CHUNG: But a lot of mistakes with made with animals,
right?
ZAVOS: Yes.
CHUNG: Isn't the success rate something like 1 percent?
ZAVOS: One percent when Dolly was produced.
CHUNG: Right. Dolly the sheep.
ZAVOS: But today there are studies that -- they show
successes of 30 and 80 percent of births from embryo
transfers.
CHUNG: Still animals, right?
ZAVOS: Still animals.
CHUNG: OK, let's stop that for a minute and go over
to Michael.
I think the big curiosity for everyone is, will this
little girl that Kathy hopefully will have, will she
look exactly like Kathy?
GUILLEN: Well, it's an interesting question. Nearly
so; about 99 percent so.
The reason she won't be identical-identical is because
there is a little bit of DNA left over in the egg
that is taken from the younger woman.
CHUNG: Because Kathy doesn't have good eggs, so they're
going to take a donor egg?
GUILLEN: Correct. Because Kathy's eggs are old...
CHUNG: And, OK, and that donor egg's DNA is going
to be taken out and Kathy's DNA is going to be put
in.
GUILLEN: Correct. And even though you have removed
the nucleus from the donor woman's egg, nevertheless
there is a little residual DNA we call mitochondrial
DNA that is left over in the outer portions of the
egg. So even though you've removed the nucleus, that
mitochondrial DNA remains, and it will contribute
about 1 percent of the total DNA.
So it will be Kathy's DNA...
CHUNG: From the donor egg?
GUILLEN: Correct. So it will be Kathy's DNA, which
is 99 percent of the total, and then 1 percent from
the donor mother.
Another variation...
CHUNG: How about -- let me ask you this: How about
personality, sense of humor, the same -- liking the
same kinds of food?
GUILLEN: That's the $64,000 question, although it's
very interesting.
I covered the story of the Texas A&M scientists
who recently cloned a cat, which is a fairly complex
animal. And before that they cloned a bull, a brahma
bull is that he has very much the same mannerisms
as the old, original bull.
But no one can tell you. I mean, no one can tell you
how much your personality is encoded in the genes.
That's the $64,000,000 question, among other things.
CHUNG: Why are you doing this? Because 85 percent
of Americans, according to surveys, don't think it
should be done.
ZAVOS: Well, obviously they don't. And some of the
research that has been done and some of the understandings
that we have is that some of those people are against
it because of fear of the unknown.
And I think that by people knowing about this and
what the complexities may be and the benefits will
be, I think more people will accept it.
The same ratio of opposition took place back when
the IVF business began.
CHUNG: I don't know, you said that before. And I understand
that; it's just that, I think with IVF, wasn't there
experimentation? For this...
ZAVOS: Very little.
CHUNG: Your team -- oh, good dear. Well your team
-- has your team actually experimented with human
eggs?
ZAVOS: Well, we work with human eggs every day.
CHUNG: Right. But you haven't done cloning with human
eggs.
ZAVOS: No. And, of course, we don't believe in experimenting
with human eggs or embryos until we're ready to execute
the real thing, because we're simply -- we are opposed
to experimenting with human embryos for the idea of
creating human embryos and killing them.
CHUNG: Would you allow me to be devil's advocate and
say, well, then, aren't Kathy and Bill going to end
up being guinea pigs?
ZAVOS: Well, you can say that. I think that when a
new technology is pioneered and is developed, you
can say that the people that receive this treatment
first are, obviously, guinea pigs to a certain degree.
But, you know, that's one way of looking at it. I
don't think that they do feel that way. And we don't
feel like that any of those people are guinea pigs.
They're just, really, people that are going to go
first, and then -- during the first team, we have
six or seven couples. Then as soon as we complete
this team, we're going to go onto the next team, which
may be seven to 10 couples. So somebody has got to
go first. But we feel like that the level of confidence
of accomplishing this particular puzzle here is very
good. And our team feels very good about coming up
with healthy children born from such effort.
CHUNG: All right. You say that you're going to check
for abnormalities, right?
ZAVOS: Yes.
CHUNG: But, as I understand it, Kathy and Bill will,
after they've taken care of what they need to do,
which is provide the DNA -- Kathy's DNA -- they'll
fly back to the United States and just wait. And it's
the surrogate who has the baby in her.
And even though -- I mean, nobody will necessarily
know that she's got a cloned baby in her stomach,
but doesn't she have to have this special medical
care to make sure that she doesn't have an abnormality?
ZAVOS: Oh, absolutely. We do have the experts -- maternal
fetal medicine experts that will monitor those pregnancies
from day one of conception until the birth of that
child.
And we intend to study the behavior of those fetuses,
the growth, the measurements, the deficiencies, the
assets -- whatever -- and then, of course, learn from
those procedures as such.
Now, this is something that that the animal cloners
have never even dreamed of doing. And this is really
why it gives us a tremendous advantage over the animal
cloners, is that in the animal business of reproduction,
we only do it right, we cannot afford to do it wrong.
CHUNG: Michael Guillen and Panos Zavos, thank you
so much.
CHUNG: And still ahead, we'll hear from a critic of
Dr. Zavos' procedure and methods.
Before we go to the break, we are sure that you have
questions about cloning to have a baby. E-mail us
at CONNIECHUNGTONIGHT@CNN.com, and we'll see if we
can get some of them answered.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
ANNOUNCER: Cloning is hardly the first controversial
method of reproduction. The development of IVF, in
vitro fertilization, triggered an avalanche of criticism
in the late '70s. Everyone from scientists to the
Vatican blasted John and Leslie Browns for volunteering
for the process after years of failing to have a baby.
They were accused of playing God and risking serious
health defects, but to the Browns, it was all worth
it.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) JOHN BROWN, LOUISE'S FATHER: The
first thing I remember is Mr. Stepner (ph) and --
who pushed that first best calls -- and Mr. Stepner
(ph) said, "I'd like to present you your baby." And
it was like, you know, his -- no matter how many times,
you know, I can never, never forget that moment, that
one moment. Fantastic!
(END VIDEO CLIP)
ANNOUNCER: Louise Joy Brown's birth didn't stop the
criticism, however. There were lingering questions
about the health of test tube babies, as they were
called, once they grew up. So what the fate of the
world's first test tube baby? The answer, when we
return.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
ANNOUNCER: Whatever happened to the world's first
test tube baby? Louise Joy Brown grew up healthy and
normal, becoming a nursery school nurse, proud of
her part in history.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: She was created as a guinea pig
and Louise Brown will remain a guinea pig for the
rest of her life.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
ANNOUNCER: But Brown has said she doesn't mind the
attention.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
LOUISE JOY BROWN, WORLD'S FIRST TEST TUBE BABY: Apart
from the press being a pain in the neck and...
(LAUGHTER)
(END VIDEO CLIP)
ANNOUNCER: Today, hundreds of thousands of babies
have been born through IVF. Louise's younger sister,
also a test tube baby, went on to have a little boy,
proving that IVF does not cause sterility.
Recently, cloning advocates have argued that American
skittishness about reproductive technology allowed
Britain to take the lead in IVF. And this year, one
of the doctors who made Louise Joy Brown possible,
said he too endorses cloning if it's shown to be safe.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I think that God really wants
us to do this. That is the next step. I can't imagine
any other reason why we haven't had a child other
than this is what we were meant to do.
We do realize that there a lot of people are against
it for whatever reason and hopefully, they'll be educated
and understand and be sympathetic and change.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
CHUNG: You just saw Bill and Kathy, who may make history
by making a baby through human cloning. Many religions
have weighed in against cloning, so have many public
officials. Within the scientific community, there's
a great deal of controversy as well. Cloning pioneer,
Dr. Panos Zavos, is back with us and we're also joined
by Dr. Zev Rosenwaks, director of reproductive medicine
at the Neill Cornell Medical Center here in New York.
Thank you for joining us. Dr. Rosenwaks, what is your
primary, overriding criticism of human cloning?
DR. ZEV ROSENWAKS, DIRECTOR, REPRODUCTIVE MED. NEILL
CORNELL MED. CTR.: I worry about its safety primarily
and...
CHUNG: Safety, meaning?
ROSENWAKS: Safety meaning that in almost all animal
studies, almost all animals, the miscarriage rate
has been extraordinarily high, 80 to 90 percent, even
in the easiest species to perform cloning. There have
been many abnormalities reported, including various
organ problems like liver enlargement, respiratory
problems, even immune deficiencies. And some of these
-- in fact, you cannot even...
CHUNG: You mean in the offspring?
ROSENWAKS: In the offspring and some of them, if you
were able to look into the uterus or by ultrasound,
you wouldn't be able to tell that these fetuses were
abnormal.
CHUNG: Oh, so no matter how many tests you would do,
you wouldn't be able to tell?
ROSENWAKS: Yes, many of them are so subtle that they
don't even show up until after birth. So, the efficiency,
the low efficiency, and the fact that there are so
many complications make me worry.
CHUNG: And you're saying efficiency is success rate?
ROSENWAKS: Efficiency is important. Success rate.
And in fact, when you promise a couple a child, they
have to be ready for disappointment, even in the best
IVF programs, depending on age of the woman, for example.
And there is one other major issue...
CHUNG: OK, go ahead.
ROSENWAKS: Where the cell comes from, that you get
the DNA may, in fact, impact on the success of cloning.
It's been shown in animals. The older the animal,
the less the chance of the cloning experience in terms
of success.
CHUNG: OK, but you know Dr. Zavos is an embryologist.
He's not a medical doctor. But shouldn't embryologists
-- you are a medical doctor, but you're not an embryologist,
are you? Shouldn't an embryologist really know, in
the laboratory, what works and what doesn't work?
ROSENWAKS: Well, I think -- you know, it's interesting
for me when I heard the couple and I heard Dr. Zavos
that he will do this in an undisclosed place, in a
country or place that allows cloning.
CHUNG: So are you suggesting that secrecy is all part
of it?
ROSENWAKS: Well, I question why is it that in the
United States or in other countries in the western
world, cloning has not been allowed. Usually, when
we do human experimentation -- I would put cloning
as a human experiment -- we seek the advice of our
peers in the form of institutional review boards.
These review boards are made up of physicians, scientists,
lay people, clergymen, ethicists and so on. And they
evaluate a particular procedure with particular, particular
attention to safety of an individuals involved.
CHUNG: All right.
ZAVOS: I don't disagree with what Dr. Rosenwaks is
saying tonight, especially on the IRB approval issue.
CHUNG: IRB being?
ZAVOS: IRB, the Investigational Review Board. I have
done a great deal of research on that and it's been
approved by IRB committees before, et cetera, et cetera.
The moral of the story is that this research is been
confronted by the politicians in this country and
ethicists and so on so heavily that there is no chance
on Earth that this technology can be developed and
be applied in America as it is today.
CHUNG: All right. Well, what if you're going to create
a Hitler or it gets in the wrong hands and you're
going to create an Osama bin Laden?
ZAVOS: But Connie, you need to understand here that,
you know, these -- those are not problems that we
are -- that we can solve today. I think our government
and our politicians and our House of Representatives,
instead of debating on banning this technology, ought
to come around and say, OK, let's agree on one thing
that this technology can be developed safely and therefore,
we need to stop thinking about who developed this
technology and how can we regulate it...
CHUNG: All right.
ZAVOS: ... and apply it constructively in order to
come up...
CHUNG: OK.
ZAVOS: ... with the right results.
CHUNG: Very quickly, I gave you a long time to talk
in that previous segment, so let me ask you, Dr. Rosenwaks.
You know, Dr. Zavos says that when the other reproductive
medicine -- the IVF and all those other methods started,
there wasn't a lot of information, research, testing.
ROSENWAKS: Well, there was a lot of work on in vitro
fertilization in various animals. IVF, in fact, was
done and embryo transfer was done many years before
the first report of a human baby within in vitro fertilization.
In fact, the first embryo transfer procedure in an
animal, in a rabbit, was done a 100 -- over a 100
years ago. The fact is...
CHUNG: All right.
ROSENWAKS: ... experiments were done. However, I think...
CHUNG: Let me ask you one more thing then.
ROSENWAKS: Yes.
CHUNG: Do you see cloning as the next step eventually,
if everything is all cleared up to your satisfaction
and the satisfaction of others in your world?
ROSENWAKS: Well, I'm not sure. I think that there
are many issues with cloning that were not issues
with IVF. With IVF, you have the union of a sperm
and an egg. Essentially, what we do with IVF is facilitate
nature. We allow the sperm and the egg to get together.
With cloning, we create a new individual with the
nucleus of someone who is older and an egg of another
person. There are concerns regarding how that egg
will, in fact, control that nucleus. Will it allow
all of the genes to manifest themselves or only part
of them?
ZAVOS: Well, I...
CHUNG: Dr. Zavos?
ZAVOS: ... I want to go back to the argument that
Bob Edwards makes -- that's the father of IVF...
CHUNG: Yes.
ZAVOS: ... that says that if this technology is pursued
properly and developed properly, it can be another
option for infertility couples. And that pretty much
will do it -- what we aim to do, is develop the technology
and make it available for infertile couples such as
Bill and Kathy.
CHUNG: All right. Dr. Zavos, Dr. Rosenwaks, thank
you so much for being with us. We appreciate it. And
I hope you can come back and discuss this further
as the cloning process develops.
ZAVOS: Sure, I'd like to.
CHUNG: A quick reminder -- if you still have questions
about cloning, to have a baby, e-mail us at CONNIECHUNGTONIGHT@CNN.com.
And we'll see if we can get some answered. We'll be
right back.
|
|

|
|